Tuesday, 29 March 2022

A small adjustment to the Baldalux's double-exposure prevention mechanism

Zodel Baldalux–view of top plate
Anticipating a trip abroad in the near future, the first since the global pandemic, I was considering which medium format camera to take with me, and naturally thought of the 6x9 folding Zodel Baldalux camera. Over the past decade this has accompanied me on many trips, and usually provides fairly good results for its modest specifications. However, since I'd first acquired the camera, I'd always been using it with the double-exposure prevention disabled. I'd done this as it had begun to continually trip to the 'exposed' position, denoted by a red 'E' in the small square window on the camera's top plate. In this position, the shutter release on the body is prevented from being depressed and the only way to release the shutter is either with a cable release attached to the lens or, rather more clumsily, by pulling down the lever on the shutter which connects to the body shutter release linkage, and this is a good way to get one's fingers in front of the lens. I taped a small L-shaped piece of card in place to stop the mechanism from shifting to the 'E' position, which, at the time, seemed like a good–and reversible–intervention. At the time I wrote "I've yet to accidentally double-expose a frame, but I'm sure that this will happen." This did happen subsequently, not too often, but picking up the Baldalux once more, I decided to look at this again.

Double-exposure prevention mechanism disabled with card and tape
To remove the top plate of the camera, there are four screws, two at each end, which are fairly easily loosed. I found that it was simple enough to keep the top plate level, and not actually take them out from their respective holes. I could lift and pivot the plate on the shutter release (which pops up when the camera is unfolded) and remove the piece of card, which looked a little frayed at the edges after ten years. Before taking the plate off completely, the shutter release button needs to be removed. Opening the camera makes the shutter release stand proud of the top plate, which may make it easier to undo. In the centre of the release is a separate slotted screw cap which once undone, lifts off with the shutter button, itself sitting on the release pin that has a threaded top that the screw cap connects to.


Shutter release with slotted centre cap.
With the shutter release removed, the camera's top plate can be taken off, and, as mentioned, kept upright with the screws in their holes at either end. Underneath the top plate, loose, but on the shutter release pin, is a short arm that has the screw fitting for the cable release slot on the top plate. This can be simply lifted off.

Shutter release pin with cable release arm
At this point, although separate from the top plate, I removed the film advance knob. This is best seen in the image above showing how I originally disabled the mechanism: slightly off centre in the middle of the knob is a tiny screw–very easy to loose!–which needs to be unscrewed before the advance knob itself can be unscrew: the two images below show it positioned for unexposed ('O') and exposed ('E').

Double-exposure prevention mechanism in 'unexposed' position 'O'.

Double-exposure prevention mechanism in 'exposed' position 'E'.
The sequence of how the mechanism should work from the unexposed position, through exposed to unexposed again is as follows:
  1. Having first cocked the shutter, as the shutter release is depressed, the shaft under the button pushes against a detent in a vertical section of the forward arm (seen below the rectangular hole around the shutter release pin in the pictures above). For this to work once the top plate is removed, I placed the shutter release button onto the shutter release pin (this did not need to be fixed with the central screw plate to activate the mechanism).
  2. This pushes the forward arm down and away from the front of the camera: the right hand end of the arm is held in tension by a spring. This downward movement releases a small angled catch at the end of the arm which can then slip past a vertical section of the lower or rear arm, and is pulled taut past this vertical piece by the spring. A section of the detent on the forward arm is now underneath the shutter release button shaft, preventing its depression, and thus preventing double exposure.
  3. Simultaneously, the other end of the forward arm travels under the viewfinder to the left side of the mechanism where it pulls on a linkage to move the double-exposure indicator from 'O' to 'E'. This also causes a flat pin to protrude towards the film advance knob.
  4. To reset the mechanism, the film advance knob needs to be rotated. Under the advance knob (now removed), there is a kind of cap which sits over the shaft of the film advance column (which travels through the top of the camera body to the take-up spool inside). This has two arms either side with downward pointing ends.
  5. As the advance knob rotates, one of these arms pushes the flat pin of the indicator linkage towards the back of the camera body and in doing so this pulls the forward arm to slip its small catch over the vertical section of the rear arm. This pulls the detent away from the shutter release button shaft. The shutter can now be tripped again.
  6. Meanwhile the indicator linkage shifts from 'E' back to 'O' and the flat pin of the linkage slips out from the arm of the film advance cap and springs back to a position where the advance can now rotate freely without connecting with the pin.
With the camera top plate removed, turning the cap that would normally be hidden by the advance knob was pushing the flat pin in the indicator linkage, shifting the position from 'E' to 'O', but once released from the pressure of the arm, the mechanism sprang back to 'E', My initial thought was that the spring on the other end of the forward arm no longer held this in sufficient tension–hardly surprising after sixty-odd years–to pull it firmly back into the 'O' position, and the small catch at that end was loose enough to slip back past the upright which should stop it.

Detail of spring, catch and hook
I stretched a couple of loops of the spring over the hook to which it is attached to increase the tension, then reduced it to one loop as this felt too much. This did not solve the issue; I wondered whether it was the spring at the other end under the indicator linkage, but this is slightly more difficult to access. Manipulating the whole linkage here by hand, it looked as though the flat pin on the linkage did not travel far enough to lock this into the 'O' position. Removing the cap on the film advance column, I tried to bend the ends of the two arms so that these would flare slightly outwards, as in the picture below (I didn't take a 'before' photo). This seemed to have solved the problem: in this position, they push the flat pin of the indicator linkage further towards the back of the camera as they rotate, and the linkage now locks into the 'O' position until the shutter is released.

Cap with arms showing adjusted angle
Reassembly is a case of following the disassembly steps backwards: the cap should sit firmly over the advance column–the hole on top has squared-off ends in order to turn the advance, which correspond with the top of the film advance. Replacing the film advance knob, I found I needed to firmly hold the key inside the camera which sits in the end of the 120 film spool with pliers to screw the knob on tightly enough to get the two halves of the tiny screw hole to match so that the screw can be reinserted. Replacing the top plate merely needs the tiny arm for the cable release positioning correctly before reinserting the screws at both ends, then finally replacing the shutter button on its pin and screwing down the small plate at its centre to secure this. Before reassembly, I also polished the indicator plate, somewhat tarnished, particularly over the letter 'O'.


Monday, 7 March 2022

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor
Thanks to Lomography's reintroduction and support of 110 film, this subminiature drop-in, cartridge load format–despite all its drawbacks–is not obsolete as it once was, and looked to remain, at some point in the 2000s when Kodak and Fuji stopped making 110 film. Early last year, during a period of pandemic restrictions, I found myself looking at Agfa's range of 110 cameras from the 1970s again. I had used the Agfa Optima 6000 Pocket Sensor camera for a while, but had ultimately sold it on; looking back to that post, I realise that I'd only used reloaded 110 cartridges with the camera, and no new 110 film. This was partly, I think, due to having never been quite satisfied with Lomography's black and white Orca film when I'd used it before–as well as not using colour film, leaving unexplored other film options with the camera. 

In my post on the Optima 6000 pocket sensor I'd written a bit about Agfa's enthusiastic embrace of the 110 format, but neglected to mention Agfa's approach to design in the 1970s: this, I suspect, is part of the reason for the appeal of their cameras, and mention should be made of Agfa's employment of the Schlagheck & Schultes Design studio. Alfred Klomp, writing about the Optima Sensor cameras, sums it up thus:

"...the Agfa Optima marks the end of the engineer's era and the onset of the industrial designer's. Around the time of the Optima series, industrial design became a serious factor in consumer products. Flatly technical solutions didn't cut it anymore, because with increasing competition on price, manufacturers couldn't afford to disregard their users's experience. Had camera manufacturing always been the realm of the small mechanical industry, now the factories discovered that it was profitable to listen to consumers. Hence the industrial design approach. [...]

I think Agfa's idea was to design a line of cameras without reference to any mechanical heritage or past. They emancipated the camera as something technical/mechanical and gave it to the users as a friendly household instrument."
Regardless of precisely whatever it was that drew me back to Agfa's 110 cameras, online, I found a fairly inexpensive Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor. The 4000 models are towards the upper end of Agfa's range, with features that put them fairly above the usual 110 box-camera equivalents (usually a fixed focus lens, one or two aperture settings, and/or one or two shutter speeds), but below the 5000 and 6000 cameras. This also makes the 4000 cameras shorter than the 5000 and 6000s, with the Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor 12cm long when closed, compared to the 6000 at 13.2cm. 
Front view, opened for use
The first iteration, the 4000 model, takes flash cubes; this was updated to take a flip-flash, and named 4008 (presumably the eight in the name stands for the eight bulbs in the flip-flash unit). The final version of the camera from 1975 has 'tele pocket' appended to its name, and, as this suggests, it features an additional telephoto lens, and is also a little longer in the body than the other 4000 models (there was also a later 4000 flash pocket model). Having been unable to find a manual for the tele pocket version of the Agfamatic 4008, there is conflicting information online about its precise technical specifications. Many sites describe it as being 'the same' as the Agfamatic 4008 pocket sensor with the addition of the telephoto lens: the 4008 pocket version manual states a shutter speed range of 1/500th to 30 seconds; the lens is not described, but online, this is given as a 26mm f6.3 Color Apotar name. For the 4008 tele pocket model, Camera-Wiki gives an aperture of f5.6 with a focal length of 27mm (the additional lens being 47mm and f5.6) and a shutter speed range of 1/1000th to 15 seconds - but having timed the longest exposure (with the shutter closing again–see comments about night photography below), this is 30 seconds. Apart from the telephoto lens however, it is a different camera from the non-tele 4008: notably, the focus scale itself is different (which might suggest the possibility of a different lens) close focus being 1.2 metres; the sliding focus scale has markings at distances from 1.5, 2, 3, 5, and infinity. The non-tele model has just three settings with pictograms for 5m-infinity (a mountain), 2-5m (two people) and 1-2m (one person): on the other side of this scale, it's marked 4, 2, 1 metres for flash. Intriguingly, the Apphotnum website describes the Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket as a 

"special model based on 4008 but with some elements borrowed to 5008 and 6008"–without stating what those elements are. Given the slightly more detailed focus scale on the 4008 tele pocket model

, one might speculate that this might be helpful for more accurately focussing a slightly faster lens, especially as the aperture is fixed 

(the sliding scale is also longer–allowing for more accurate intermediate positions)

; in addition, having a slightly faster lens might also call for a higher top speed of 1/1000th (as well as a shorter long exposure limit) - however, without knowing the true specifications this is just speculation. 

Although neither f6.3 nor f5.6 is especially fast, either would be a large improvement on simpler 110 cameras which commonly feature f9, f11 or smaller aperture fixed focus lenses. 

Top view showing focus slider, cable release thread, telephoto lens selector,
flipflash socket and sensor shutter release
As can be seen from the image above, most of the user controls are located on the top right of the camera, easily accessible by fingers on the user's right hand: the big orange sensor shutter release, the focus slider and selector for the telephoto lens. This switches between the normal lens, behind the shutter, to the telephoto lens, which swings in front of the shutter. The viewfinder also changes, with an additional hinged component for the wider-angle view that the normal lens requires. There is a cable release socket between the focus scale and shutter release, useful given the camera's impressive shutter speed range–whether this runs from 1/500th to 30 seconds, or from 1/1000th to 15 seconds. Partially depressing the shutter button, a red light inside the viewfinder shows as a long exposure warning if exposure is below 1/30th. The manual for the non-tele version of the 4008 also describes holding a finger over the small CDS meter and partially depressing the button for a battery check. The viewfinder itself has a simple frame outline with a single mark for parallax. On the bottom of the camera is a sliding catch to unlock the camera for opening; typically, frame advance is by opening and closing the camera. The catch on the bottom can be put in the 'close' position while the camera is open, which means that when the camera is pushed into the closed position, it locks closed, rather than (for example) having to hold the camera closed and then sliding the catch back to lock it. To load the camera, a small sliding catch releases the back of the camera. 

Battery cover opened, showing LR44 instead of V625U batteries
The camera takes two V625U batteries, hidden behind the name and model number panel on the front of the camera, with a subtle finger grip to slide this open. I tried two LR44 button cell batteries when I first received the camera, and these seem to work perfectly well, and, despite being a slightly different shape from the V625U, the nature of the battery compartment design with two angled, sprung contacts, secures these without any need to adapt them (such as with a washer or other spacer that would need to be conductive). Incidentally, the shutter will not open to expose film without batteries inserted, although there's clearly both a mechanical element as well as an electronic one to the shutter: pressing the shutter release without batteries inserted does trip the shutter–which appears to be a guillotine-type–and one blade can be seen replacing another, which makes a noise, deceptive perhaps, and the film can be advanced to cock the shutter again–but the lens remains covered.

Detail of accessory shoe, wrist strap and tripod socket
One final feature on the camera is its accessory shoe, which can be used to mount the dedicated Agfalux 400T electronic flash unit, with a cable that plugs into the flipflash socket; the accessory shoe is also used to attach the wrist strap, which fixes into a plastic tab via a screw fitting inserted into the accessory shoe: this doubles as a tripod socket.

Agfamatic 4008 with Lomography Orca film
I first used the Agfamatic 4008 during the period of restrictions early in 2021 while still working from home, but leaving the house for exercise, walking and cycling. I tested the camera with some reloaded 16mm film to make sure everything worked, and then shot cartridges of both Lomography Orca film and expired Fukkatsu black and white film. The Fukkatsu film had a "PROCCESS [sic] BEFORE" date of 2018, and is marked 100 ISO–but is packaged in a cartridge with a high film speed tab. This isn't an important concern for many simple 110 format cameras which do not sense the film speed but, for those which do–like the Agfamatic 4008–the film would therefore be underexposed. When Kodak designed the 110 cartridge, they included the possibility of indicating film speed by the length of the tab at one end of the cartridge, without specifying what ISO these referred to, leaving it to camera manufacturers to designate: essentially there is a low ISO cartridge tab (long) and a high ISO tab (short). There's very little information online about Fukkatsu films (it's not listed on the Massive Dev Chart; the box does state "PROCCESS [sic] D-76/ID-11" but without any times), and certainly no times for a two-stop push, and, as a result, this was left on a shelf undeveloped for months.

Fukkatsu 110 Black & White Film
In late December, looking for a camera and some film to put in a pocket for a cycle ride, I went back to the Agfamatic 4008; I had a cartridge of Lomography Orca film, but, as the light levels were low, with  short days of overcast weather, I cut the film speed tab on the Orca cartridge to expose it as a high speed film. When it came to developing the Orca film, like the Fukkatsu film, the Massive Dev Chart wasn't much help in terms of times, with only entries for Orca at box speed in Rodinal, my preferred developer. I used Adox Adonal (a Rodinal clone) at a dilution of 1+25 for 14 minutes at 20ºC, an educated guess for a two-stop push. I also loaded the tank with the roll of Fukkatsu film shot earlier in the year just to see what the results were with the same development time as the Orca film. Incidentally, the Fukkatsu cartridge came apart very easily after scoring with a knife, to remove the film in the dark. I've used Lomography Orca before, but have generally been underwhelmed by the film in the past; when scanning the negatives after pushing the film, I was pleasantly surprised by the results.

Lomography Orca film, pushed two stops
The estimated development time worked well enough, and the film scanned quite easily; any increase in contrast was not especially discernible given the low-level, low-contrast lighting conditions. Ultimately, the Lomography Orca film when pushed gave the best results with the camera, and I'd certainly expose and develop the film in this way in future.  The extended development time also worked for the Fukkatsu film exposed months earlier.

Fukkatsu B&W film, pushed two stops
For a second roll of the Fukkatsu film, I wanted to expose it at the right exposure index, so needed a way for the camera to recognise the cassette as being a low ISO film. As a simple expedient, I cut a short length from a wooden skewer and taped it at the bottom of the tab, which would connect to the button inside the camera. 

Fukkatsu 110 cartridges, front cartridge (left) modified for low film speed
When I developed this roll, I found that the focus seemed a little off on many of the frames. This could have been user error, but there were a few shots that would have been set to infinity focus (such as in the image below), and these were very soft. I suspect that the piece of wood taped to the cassette end upset the lens-to-film plane distance a small amount, being a little thicker than the cassette on its own (as a consequence of the format's design, the tolerances of using paper-backed film inside the plastic cassette is in itself not ideal in this regard). A better approach may have been to simply reload the film into a properly-tabbed 110 cartridge.

Fukkatsu B&W film at box speed
I also used some Kodak Plus-X, reloaded into a slow-film speed tabbed cassette. Like many 110 cameras, the Agfamatic 4008 does need the format's single perforation for each frame: reloading the cassette with double perforated 16mm film means that the internal pin locates each perforation, preventing the film from advancing any further, so, to avoid overlapping exposures, a second 'blank' shot needs to be taken to advance the film sufficiently. With unperforated film, the camera's lens does not cock, and the film will wind all the way through without stopping.

Kodak Plus-X in reloaded 110 cartridge
Using double perforated film, the perforations do show prominently at the top and bottom of the frame. I did get some overlapping exposures, and some in which I did not cover the lens enough when making the second exposure. Reloading 110 cartridges with 16mm film does make use of the whole negative area, without the pre-exposed frames of the 110 format; with single perforated film, and with cropping these out, very little of the image area would be lost in relation to a pre-exposed 110 frame.

Long exposure with Lomography Orca film (pushed two stops)
Given the Agfamatic 4008's shutter speed range, I wanted to test long exposures with the camera. With relatively low light, this seemed to work pretty well: I made some test exposures at night, under moderately low interior lighting, placing the camera on a table for stability rather than a tripod, and could hear the lens open and close with exposures measured in seconds, as in the image above; taking photographs outside at night with the camera, I found that the shutter stayed open. This may possibly be intentional, an effective 'B' setting if the exposure is longer than 30 seconds, but the shutter only closes when advancing the film–which is very hard, if not impossible to do without moving the camera and this showing up in the resulting image, as seen below with the light trails (there is also a small amount of camera shake). However, with care, it is possible to get sufficiently good night shots with the Agfamatic 4008 as seen in the second image below.
Long exposure with Lomography Orca film at box speed
Long exposure with Fukkatsu B&W film at box speed
The one feature of the Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor I've left to last is the telephoto lens: on my camera, selecting this simply resulted in out of focus images, as in the comparison of the two frames below. Initially I did wonder whether, when engaging this lens, the camera's focus lever had to be set at different distances from the normal lens, but there are no markings for this, which one would expect if this was intentional. Despite the possibility of an effective 'B' setting as described above, it's impossible to keep the shutter open to check how the focus works with the telephoto lens: ideally, one could use tape in the back of the open camera and a loupe, but, having tried covering the light sensor to get the shutter to stick open, it still closes again shortly afterwards if it's in an environment bright enough to be able to examine the camera.

Lomography Orca film (box speed) with normal lens

Lomography Orca film (box speed) with telephoto lens

The out of focus telephoto lens is a bit of a puzzle: sliding the focus scale, the telephoto lens clearly moves with the scale, but there does not appear to be any means to adjust the lens itself. It's possible that the telephoto lens in my camera may have always been out of registration, but, short of taking it apart to investigate, this is unknowable (the camera doesn't have any damage to suggest a significant knock or drop which might have caused such a problem). Putting aside the unusable telephoto lens, the camera itself is one of the better 110 cameras around (even without the telephoto lens, the more accurate focussing scale might make it preferable to the standard 4008 model), and Agfamatics of all kinds seem to be very plentiful on the secondhand market. It's clearly not in the same league as the Pentax 110 Auto, but still a good camera for a once all-but-obsolete film format which, unlikely as it seems, is still catered for in 2022. 

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with Fukkatsu B&W film at box speed

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with Fukkatsu B&W film at box speed

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with Lomography Orca at box speed

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with Lomography Orca at box speed

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with Plus-X

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with Plus-X

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with push-processed Fukkatsu B&W film

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with push-processed Fukkatsu B&W film

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with push-processed Lomography Orca film

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with push-processed Lomography Orca film

Agfa Agfamatic 4008 tele pocket sensor with push-processed Lomography Orca film

Sources/further reading:




Sunday, 30 January 2022

127 Day January 2022

Zeiss Ikon Ikonta 520/18 with Ilford HP5 Plus
As I wrote in my entry for December's 127 Day, I rarely miss the opportunity of shooting 127 format cameras on the calendrical 127 days, and last Thursday's January iteration was no exception. It was however a working day, and in addition, the day began very dull and overcast, with very low light levels on the way to work shortly after sunrise–not dissimilar to the weather in December. I used the Baby Ikonta again, which has a moderately wide aperture lens at f3.5, compared to other 127 format cameras which I might have chosen had the weather been better. Partly as a result of the low light levels I took very few pictures on the way to work; then, with a busy day at work, I took fewer photographs than I might have done, just one roll of cut-down Ilford HP5 Plus, but the light did improve later in the day as the clouds cleared, and I made use of this, taking a few frames around windows before the light went. Had the day remained overcast, I might have been tempted to develop the film to compensate by adding a stop to increase contrast (I'd estimated exposure with reference to the 'Sunny 16' rule) but I went with box speed after the light improved, using Adox Adonal diluted 1+25 for 6 minutes at 20ºC.









Friday, 24 December 2021

Rollei Ortho 25 plus - single roll review

Rollei Ortho 25 plus in 35mm
"Although panchromatic films are used for nearly all general photography today, we should avoid prejudice against other emulsions since they may have practical and aesthetic applications. Both orthochromatic and blue-sensitive films are usually capable of higher contrast than panchromatic film. An orthochromatic film can be quite luminous in rendering foliage in the landscape since the foliage green is rendered relatively light, comparable to our visual response; caution must be exercised if the subject contains red-reflecting surfaces such as certain rocks, tree bark, and flowers, since these will be rendered quite dark. It can also be used in portraiture, where it will emphasise skin features such as lips and freckles, and darken (sometimes excessively) a ruddy complexion."
Ansel Adams, The Negative

Orthochromatic film has seen something of an (admittedly niche) increase in popularity in recent years, most notably with Ilford releasing its Ortho Plus in both 35mm and medium format after many years of only being available in sheet film sizes. My experiences with other orthochromatic emulsions, such as Rollei ATO 2.1 Supergraphic and Kodagraph Ortho Negative film has often been one of attempting to tame their inherent high contrast to use the films for pictorial purposes, unlike the graphic arts applications that these were formulated for; other experiences with more general purpose orthochromatic camera films, such as the original Kodak Verichrome, Ilford Selochrome Fast Ortho and various glass plates, all involved using photographic material which was many decades old, where achieving any result in and of itself was far more important a consideration than the aesthetics of an orthochromatic rendering of a scene, thus negating, as Ansel Adams describes, the reasons one might favour orthochromatic over panchromatic film.

In my post on the Lomography Berlin Kino film, nearly six months ago now, I wrote of the #ShittyCameraChallenge prize I'd received (sponsored by David Walster - @196photo on Twitter), four different rolls of 35mm black and white film, none of which I'd used before. I also wrote about how I usually like to test films a little more fully before writing about them, but given the four all very different emulsions, I thought I might post 'single roll' reviews of these particular films. Towards the end of August, I shot the Rollei Ortho 25 plus with my Voigtländer Vito B. I chose this camera as I thought that its lens might be a sympathetic fit to the look of an orthographic emulsion, although this is probably too nuanced to really matter that much. Despite my best intentions, after developing the film languished until such time that I had to scan it and work over the digital images (generally, just spotting and adjusting levels). My previous use of other ortho films (as well as other slow films) gave me some idea of what to expect–or so I thought. I actually loaded the film under red safelight conditions in an attempt to get as many frames as possible from the roll, so as not to expose the start of the roll, pulling out enough film to secure the end to the take-up spool. The data sheet for Rollei Ortho 25 plus does state that "blue-green sensitivity allows the film to be handled under red darkroom lighting" but also under 'Laboratory Lighting': "The film can be processed in absolute darkness and should not be exposed to sunlight or darkroom lighting!" Presumably this refers to amber safelights rather than dark red. In the event, I got 39 frames on the 36-exposure roll, possibly not worth the extra effort.

After I developed the film and scanned the negatives, the results were more grainy than I had anticipated (for a 25 ISO film in comparison to other slow films I've used; clearly its nothing like a typical 400 ISO film). This may have been due to some overdevelopment and possibly some over-exposure (the grain is particularly prominent in the sky). Possibly some of this might be scanner noise, which I do find happens with dense negatives on my desktop scanner. I used Rodinal (as Ars Imago #9) to develop the film; possibly I should have used a higher dilution of 1+50 instead of 1+25 (the data sheet recommends Rollei Supergrain developer, not one I've ever used). Rodinal should work well with a slow film in theory: looking at other examples online, there does seem to be a range in terms of how fine the grain appears. Ideally, I'd like to print from the negatives in the darkroom, but my use of a darkroom for printing has somewhat been curtailed by the pandemic.

As most of the photographs were taken outside, often with a fair bit of sky in the frame, I did shoot a few frames with a yellow filter for comparison against those without (there was probably as much grey sky during the August of 2021 as there was blue). Generally, the sky has a 'soft' look to it, picking up more definition than I might have expected given the excess of blue light, but the use of a yellow filter does improve this: in the images below, the one with the filter really picks out the satellite dish against the darker sky on the distant building; at the same time it also makes some of the foliage lighter, with the tree in the middle of the frame appearing oddly washed out. I may have overcompensated in the exposure when using the yellow filter. I also feel the necessity of having a colour image here to really see exactly how the orthochromatic emulsion renders certain colours into tones.

Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus - without filter

Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus - with yellow filter

Without a filter, bright summer clouds in a blue sky do begin to blend together,giving the soft look I described as in the example below. I would have liked to have tried more of a range of filters than I did: the data sheet lists yellow, orange, and red filters: to be listed, I imagine that a red filter would still transmit enough of the spectrum that the film is sensitive enough to record.

Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus - no filter

Some of the frames with particularly localised areas of strong highlights appear to show some halation, as in the images below. This may be due to the Vito B's lens, although this isn't something I've really noticed before and the Color-Skopar on the camera is coated. This isn't an unpleasant artefact, but worth being aware of when shooting–in so much as it may be an effect to seek out. A comparison with shooting the film in a different camera with a more modern lens might be useful here, but outside the scope of this post. Incidentally, all the photographs I took with the film were handheld, mostly outside on bright days where the 25 ISO speed was not and issue–the interior shot below was quite well lit from the window.

Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus
Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus

I didn't use the film for any portraits, so I can't specifically relate this use to part of what Ansel Adams writes about as regards portraiture. One subject that the film might be apt for could be architecture perhaps: rendering colour into equivalent tones may not be that necessary, and the slow speed of the film is less of a consideration than any potentially moving subjects. I did take a number of photographs which featured brickwork, and it would have been interesting to see how the ortho film rendered red bricks, but these are all yellow London stock bricks in the images below (in the third image, the wall of the house in the background is red brick though: the mortar stands out quite well against the bricks and just possibly this is enhanced by being rendered by orthographic film). 

Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus
Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus
Voigtländer Vito B with Rollei Ortho 25 plus

From using a single roll of Rollei Ortho 25 plus, I don't feel as though I've sufficiently tested the films capabilities: it would be useful to compare the results with the same subjects shot with panchromatic film, to try different developers, experiment more with filters, and print from the negatives, rather than simply scanning from them, as is the case with this post. It would be interesting to compare it to Ilford Ortho Plus too, a slightly faster orthographic film. Rollei Ortho 25 plus is also available in both medium format rollfilm and large format sheet film (according to the data sheet, in 4x5, 5x7, and 8x10 inch sizes) and I can imagine that it would be worth trying the film out in other sizes as well as the other approaches outlined above.









Sources/further reading
Rollei Ortho 25 plus data sheet (PDF)
Rollei Ortho 25 plus on Film Photography London
Rollei Ortho 25 plus on Blue Moon Camera Codex
Rollei Ortho 25 plus Alex Luyckx Blog
Ansel Adams, The Camera, Little, Brown and Company, New York 1980, twelfth paperback printing, 2005.