Showing posts with label 3x4. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3x4. Show all posts

Thursday, 12 December 2019

127 Day December 2019

Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
For last weekend's 127 Day I chose to shoot with the Baby Box Tengor, a choice partly influenced I think by also taking photographs for the current #shittycamerachallenge. The Baby Box Tengor is capable of reasonable results, but it is just a simple small box camera with no adjustable aperture, focus or shutter, other than the choice between instant or time exposures. I used just two offcut ends of Ilford HP5 Plus: when cutting down a roll of medium format to 127 size, after rolling the right length for the format, there's always some film left over, around five 4x3cm frames, although it's hard to be exact when cutting the film in a dark bag (this operation would be easier if the film was unrolled on a worktop in the dark and some form of jig made to get the correct length). There were a few light leaks, but also one roll could have been better developed, more attention paid to agitation, with air getting trapped between the film and plastic spool; I wound up with ten shots in total, a couple of instances where I'd taken two shots of the same subject from similar positions, and two where the frame partly overlapped the end of the film - one of which was too slight to be worth scanning.

Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus

Thursday, 7 March 2019

'Take Your Box Camera To Work Day' 2019


The 28th of February, this year's Take Your Box Camera To Work Day, although warmer than usual, was more typical of the season than the previous couple of days, with record high temperatures for a February in the UK. There was some fleeting sunshine during the afternoon on the day, but it was mostly overcast; I had chosen to use my Baby Box Tengor (both for its compactness and number of shots on a roll) and, appropriate to the lighting conditions, a single roll of cut-down medium format Ilford HP5 Plus, subsequently developed in RO9 One Shot. I had removed the taped-in yellow filter from behind the lens: the film was fast enough for most of the photographs to be shot on the 'instant' setting, including well-lit interiors (just a couple of frames used the 'B' setting for longer exposures). The results demonstrate some problems with light leaks - the back of the camera does not always sit flush, working itself loose on the opposite side of the body from the catch which is supposed to ensure that the camera back is secure. A couple of frames showed up some issues with film flatness too, which may be related to the back not being secure, but the Baby Box Tengor was a good choice, providing generally good results given all its limitations, with the latitude of HP5 Plus making up for the variability in lighting conditions throughout the day.









Friday, 21 July 2017

127 Day Summer 2017

Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford FP4 Plus
I shot two rolls of cut-down film on last week's 127 Day, one Ilford FP4 Plus and the other HP5 Plus, with the Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor. In between the two rolls, as with the 116 Day last month, I cut and taped a piece of yellow gelatine filter inside the camera behind the lens, to improve definition in the skies and to act as a one-stop neutral density filter when shooting the HP5 Plus in the bright sun, while the FP4 Plus had been a fortuitous choice for the more overcast conditions earlier in the day.

Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford FP4 Plus
Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford FP4 Plus
Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford FP4 Plus
Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus
Zeiss Ikon Baby Box Tengor with Ilford HP5 Plus

Sunday, 29 January 2017

127 Day January 2017

Zeiss Ikon Ikonta 520/18 with Agfapan Agfa APX 100
For last Friday's 127 Day, I shot just the one roll of film, cut down medium format Agfapan APX 100 with a 'develop before' date of January 2009. I used the Baby Ikonta again; given the weather conditions and short daylight hours, a number of the shots were long exposures on the 'T' setting. With smaller apertures, generally around f16, the Novar lens performs well, against the hand held shots three or four stops wider; I rated the APX 100 at box speed, being less than ten years past its 'develop before' date, although ideally a faster film would have been more appropriate for the day.








Wednesday, 27 July 2016

The V. P. Twin

V. P. Twin with soft case
Having written a moderately comprehensive post about the Vest Pocket Kodak, I wanted to write a post about the other camera that I used on this month's 127 Day, the V. P. Twin. About this, there is rather less to say, but millions of these were made, and as an extremely cheap snapshot camera, the V. P. Twin may well have been the introduction to photography for a great many people, particularly in the UK where it was produced. How well it may have travelled is an unknown - on Collections Appareils it's listed as being rare in France, but a number are always available on a well-known auction site, and I have on occasion seen V. P. Twins in antique or junk shops.

V. P. Twin with wire framefinder folded out for use
The name derives from the initials for Vest Pocket, an alternate name for 127 rollfilm, and that the camera uses a frame size of 3x4cm, which means that two red windows are needed to advance the film, the numbers on the paper backing appearing twice, once in each window, to provide sixteen photographs on a roll.  The camera is made from plastic: when first produced in the mid-1930s, this was Bakelite in a number of different coloured variants; my version of the camera dates from after the war, clearly identified by the metal faceplate around the lens. Although many websites don't differentiate, there are some suggestions that, post-war, a different plastic other than bakelite was used. With my example, the plastic appears very much like Bakelite, hard and a somewhat brittle, as evidenced by a small chip broken off inside, but this is not conclusive.

V. P. Twin with wire framefinder
The camera has a fixed-focus meniscus lens of f12.5 (the instructions recommend a subject distance of eight to ten feet) and a rotary-type shutter that fires when the lever is tripped in either direction. The 1950s version of the V. P. Twin has a metal faceplate with the phrase "BLOOMED "BOLCO" LENS": BOLCo stood for British Optical Company; bloomed appears to mean that the lens was coated, which, judging from the colour of the reflections, may well be the case, although it might seem an unnecessary refinement given how basic the lens is. To compose a shot, there is a single metal frame which hinges up from the top of the camera. The advance knob provides a loud ratchet sound, making operation of the camera less than discreet given how quiet the shutter is.

V. P. Twin opened for loading
Although the instruction manual tells the user to twist a coin between the two projections at the top of the camera, and the letters "INSERT COIN AND TWIST" are embossed on the camera itself, I've found it easy enough to open using my fingers in the slot. The V. P. Twin is famous for having been sold in three individual parts, each for 6d, which, in total, converts to 7.5 pence in new money, surely one of the cheapest cameras ever made (according to one online calculator I've used, this would be the equivalent of £3.73 at 2016 prices). Although this sounds apocryphal, the onetwoseven site confirms the story. In the 1950s, the V. P. Twin was selling for 7/6, or 37.5 pence, or £6.32 at 2016 prices. For a simple camera, the instruction leaflet is very comprehensive; my camera came with both instruction leaflet and soft case.

V. P. Twin leaflet front
V. P. Twin leaflet back
I first shot a short roll of Ilford HP5 Plus cut down from medium format, and the results were very much what I imagined them to be: vignetting, distortion and so on from the meniscus lens. There were also some scratches, which may have been from the process of slitting the film to 127 size. The shutter looks and sounds very slow, but it's probably around 1/30th; some shots appear to show a small amount of camera shake, but given how little in the frame is truly sharp, it matters less than this might. As I've written about other simple cameras, the use of modern fast emulsion allows a greater flexibility in the situations in which the camera may be used. The instructions state that:
The V. P. Twin is strictly a snapshot camera. The same rules which govern Snapshot Photography with any other camera should be followed. The subject should be in broad, open sunlight, but the camera must not. The sun should be behind your back or over your shoulder.
V. P. Twin test roll with Ilford HP5 Plus
Given the typical film speeds of the 1930s when the film was first produced this advice would have been well heeded; today, being able to use a 400 ISO film with both lower contrast and good latitude means being able to ignore that stricture: the photograph above was taken on an overcast day, with plenty of shade from a nearby tree. Shooting longer rolls of film for the 127 Day did show some issues with film flatness which appeared to increase over the length of a roll; the camera has one flat tension spring at one end of the camera inside, as seen in one of the images above, which does not seem sufficient to keep the film tight as the amount on the take-up side builds up. This lack of flatness shows up as distortion, especially clear in straight lines, as shown in the second-to-last image on this post.

Maurice Fisher, on the Photographic Memorabilia website nicely sums up using the V. P. Twin as his first camera, replete with camera shake and framing errors. Accurate framing is very difficult to achieve; it's probably best to simply ensure whatever motif being photographed is simply centred. Camera shake with the V. P. Twin is partly due to the camera being so small and light, but not insurmountable if the instructions are followed to hold the camera tightly against the face to steady it; I also steadied a few shots by balancing the camera on a flat surface. As a cheap, snapshot camera, I did find the V. P. Twin to have a certain charm, and the quality of the images is easily the equivalent to the toy cameras that have become popular in recent years.

V. P. Twin with Fomapan 200
V. P. Twin with Ilford Mk V
V. P. Twin with Ilford HP5 Plus
V. P. Twin with Ilford HP5 Plus

Sources/further reading:
V. P. Twin on Camera-Wiki
Great British Cameras: The V. P. Twin

My First Camera on Photographic Memorabilia
V. P. Twin on Collections Appareils in French
V. P. Twin on onetwoseven.org.uk