Showing posts with label shitty camera challenge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shitty camera challenge. Show all posts

Monday, 31 August 2020

Revisiting the Micro 110

Micro 110 camera with reloaded 110 cartridge
Having previously used the Micro 110 camera two years ago for the #shittycamerachallenge in June 2018, when the current three-month June to August 'Quarantine Special' challange was announced, I thought I'd revisit the camera. Choosing the Micro 110 was partly due to the camera fitting the ethos of the challenge, and also as it is eminently portable. However, due to being busy with work during this period I didn't embrace the current #shittycamerachallenge as enthusiastically as I might (I had initially thought I might choose a different camera for each of the three months of the challenge, but in the event I shot most of the photos in June, then as July came around I still had a part-used cartridge in the camera, which I thought I should finish, and having loaded one more cartridge, I used that for the rest of the month into the start of August). I used 110 cartridges reloaded with 16mm Kodak Photo Instrumentation film throughout, rather than use different film stocks, and, being double perforated, the sprocket holes show up prominently in all the images.

Micro 110 with Kodak Photo Instrumentation Film
I developed the film I shot in two batches, and based on the results from the first couple of rolls once developed, I made a few changes: the initial rolls had a lot of light leaks, partly solved by using more black tape, particularly on either side of the cartridges where it met the camera body, and shielding the camera from light more carefully when advancing the film (in the image at the top of this post, there is a rubber band around one side of the cartridge, intended to block the light where the camera body meets the cartridge, but this wasn't sufficient).

Micro 110 with Kodak Photo Instrumentation Film, showing light leaks
I also changed how I was framing the photographs, realising that with the small aperture and short focal length, the camera does give a reasonable depth of focus (at least in relative terms, given the limitations of the lens), and in the second batch of photographs, I looked for compositions in which subjects were closer to the lens; the camera is hardly designed for wide expansive views. I was also more conscious that with using reloaded cartridges, without the pre-exposed frame that 110 film usually imposes, the frame is much wider than the rudimentary viewfinder indicates, albeit with a pronounced fall-off towards the left-hand of the frame. I did utilise this to effect in the one shot in vertical format, below, which gets darker to the foreground, but would have been more better without the light leaks.

Micro 110 with Kodak Photo Instrumentation Film
Thinking about the #shittycamerachallenge, and using the Micro 110 these past three months, although the camera is clearly so cheap and basic, perhaps it isn't truly 'shitty'; perhaps what really makes for the spirit of the challenge is a camera with at least some pretensions, but one that falls far short. I did think that the Halina 35X embodies this, in that there was an intention in its design to make an inexpensive 35mm camera with all the features one might require in such a camera, but done badly. However, I no longer have the Halina 35X; the Micro 110 by contrast is nothing other than the cheap plastic novelty that it so clearly is.








 
















Tuesday, 6 August 2019

July's #ShittyCameraChallenge


After being awarded second prize for May's #ShittyCameraChallenge, shooting with the Wide Pic Panoramic camera for July's challenge, I wasn't expecting to be placed (my entries weren't perhaps as gimmicky as those with the Action Sampler in May) but when the results were announced, I found I'd come second again; July's first prize winner was @VisualSly - and there was a third prize this time around that went to @Grrlish (winning second prize - for a second time  - for some reason made me think of a Pot Noodle advert from the 1990s with Peter Baynham dressed as a Pot Noodle shouting out of a car window at a runner being left behind "SILVER! SILVER!"). July's 'mystery' second prize arrived today, again donated by @196photo and again all beautifully wrapped: another thematically-appropriate book of humour, Pring's Photographer's Miscellany, and, individually wrapped in an Analogue Wonderland box, another four different rolls of 35mm film, Fomapan 200, Kodak Gold 200, Ilford Pan 100 (which I used quite a lot last year), and there was again a roll of film new to me - JCH Streetpan 400 - as well as Ilford FP4 and HP5 badges - and a 'Pile of Poop' game.

< imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;">



Wednesday, 31 July 2019

'Wide Pic' Panoramic Camera

'Wide Pic' Panoramic Camera
The title of this post has the words 'Wide Pic' with inverted commas, as this appears to be a genuine no-name camera, at least in the variant I've been using this past month for July's #ShittyCameraChallenge. It's listed on Camera-Wiki as the Panorama Wide Pic, and the term 'Wide Pic' is probably what it's best known as, or at least this brings up numerous results in an online search. With the printing on the camera itself, it seems to me that the makers of this particular camera are describing naming the lens 'Wide Pic', and that perhaps 'Panorama' next to the viewfinder may be the camera's intended name, written in a Cinerama-style expansive logotype. However the camera box has the phrase 'Panoramic Camera' written on it in large letters and the description below (with capitals) as a "35mm Panoramic Camera".

'Wide Pic' Panoramic Camera box
The box reveals little else about the camera: the number 41-665 on the side is presumably a production code or stock number. There's no manufacturer's name nor country of origin on either box or camera (although intriguingly there is a lightly recessed rounded rectangle on the bottom of the camera which is where one might expect an engraved serial number or alternatively a 'Made in..." legend - but there is a serial number printed inside the camera back). Camera-Wiki also has an entry for an Ultronic Panoramic camera, which is the same camera with a grey-silver face and different printing (and the name Ultronic Panoramic is printed in the same place that 'Panorama' is on the camera in this post); the 'Wide Pic' variant also has different coloured faces, with the back part of the cameras moulded in black. The camera is almost entirely plastic in construction, almost certainly dating from the 1990s when the panoramic format became popular, most notably through the panoramic format included in the short-lived APS system.

Wide Pic camera open to show frame mask
This camera creates a panoramic effect by masking the top and bottom of a standard 35mm frame and producing an image 13mm high by 36mm long. On Camera-Wiki the Ultronic-branded variant is listed as having a 28mm lens, giving a wide angle field of view, appropriate to the panoramic feel. The focal plane is curved to compensate for the limitations of the lens; the lens itself has elements either side of an internal aperture stop. The masking is moulded separately from the camera's rear body section, and looks as though this could be removed completely, thus giving a full-frame wide-angle camera.

Top view
The camera has a fixed focus, a fixed aperture lens and, with a single shutter speed (these are given as f11 and 1/125th on Camera-Wiki), gives the camera the simplest of user controls. The lens has a sliding cover which, when closed, also blocks the shutter release button. Frame advance is manual with a thumbwheel rather than a lever; there is a small frame counter window on the top of the camera, with economic numerals marking every third frame. Rewind is also manual, with a button to depress before rewinding on top of the camera, indicated by a symbol no doubt more familiar from an LCD screen of rather more sophisticated cameras of the same era.

Camera back with format label
The viewfinder is a reverse-Gallilean type, relatively small but clear. The back of the camera has a door latch, a label giving instructions to the user to request panoramic format when processing film and also has a film cassette window to remind the user if the camera is loaded or not.

Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
For the first roll through the camera, I used Fomapan 400, and, aptly, this was one of the rolls in my second prize package prize from May's #ShittyCameraChallenge - and I decided to shoot with the camera for July's #ShittyCameraChallenge. With regards to this, there's a price written in pencil on the box - £2.50 - which qualifies the Wide Pic camera on the criterion that the value is markedly increased once one puts a roll of film inside, let alone its other, obvious 'qualities'. The results with the Fomapan 400 adequately demonstrated all the design flaws embedded in the camera. That the camera simply crops the negative, using half the available area to create the panoramic look (as well as needlessly wasting photographic material) means that the negatives have around half the possible definition of the 35mm format; using Fomapan 400 developed in RO9 provided very pronounced grain relative to the image size as a result.

Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
The lens, despite the curved focal plane, has a clear falling-off of both illumination and definition towards both edges of the frame. In addition, the 'focus-free' boast of the camera is dependent on the depth of field provided by the short focal length of the wide-angle lens combined with a relatively small aperture - and the lens being positioned at a hyperfocal distance. However, the 'Wide Pic' camera appears to have the lens set at a distance whereby any relatively far distances are not in focus at all, as in the image above. The focus of the lens seems to be roughly positioned at around 2 metres, if not a little closer, which is not untypical of a cheap snapshot camera, designed no doubt for taking photographs of people, groups rather than portraits, such as what one might take on holiday. However, the panoramic format itself suggests that, for many users, this particular camera might not be ideally suited for photographing people, and therefore the lens seems to be set at the wrong focal distance for the kind of pictures that the camera otherwise would inspire. In the shot below the road sign to the left of centre is just discernibly more in focus than the houses behind.

Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
When shooting the first roll of film, I had thought that I would try a slower film next, in order to have finer-grained results to make up for the smaller negative format, but on developing the film I found that the frames shot in overcast conditions were thin, and even some shot in sunny conditions had little to no detail in deep shadows, as in the image below, taken early evening with weak sunlight, but sunlight nonetheless. This suggests that perhaps either the aperture may be smaller than f11, or the shutter speed is faster than 1/125th, or a little of both - the shots with subjects in full sunlight on a 400-speed film do not look overexposed.

Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
For a second roll of film, I used Ilford HP5 Plus, which, in general, resulted in better images. This was partly due to HP5 Plus having better latitude than Fomapan 400, and partly due to simply knowing what subjects were better suited to the camera's limitations after shooting my first roll with the camera.

Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Ilford HP5 Plus
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Ilford HP5 Plus
Overall, there are many poor design decisions built into the camera: the focus the lens is set to, the poor definition of the lens itself, the lack of any exposure controls, and the waste of film that the masked format requires. The ergonomics of the camera aren't ideal either: the wide angle lens means it is relatively easy to get fingers in the edge of the shot - there is a shallow finger rest (rather than strictly a grip) for the right hand, but as the lens is offset towards the right hand side of the camera instead of being centred, it does need a little care not to hold it in such a way that this may be a problem. The wide angle lens also is prone to flare when shooting into the light. However, using the Wide Pic, like many a point and shoot camera, but especially so given its elongated image format, simply requires one to think about composition and light above all else.

Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Fomapan 400
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Ilford HP5 Plus
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Ilford HP5 Plus
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Ilford HP5 Plus
Wide Pic Panoramic camera with Ilford HP5 Plus
Sources/further reading:
Camera-Wiki: Panorama Wide Pic & Ultronic Panoramic entries
Panorama Wide Pic on Canny Cameras
Wide Pic Panoramic camera vs Fuji TX-1 by Ryan Minchin



Friday, 7 June 2019

May's #ShittyCameraChallenge


Having written up my experiences of using the Uboot Action Sampler as part of May's #ShittyCameraChallenge, sharing some of the animated GIFs on Twitter of course, I was then rather surprised to learn that I'd been awarded second prize; first prize went to Kevin Spaghetti - @SpaghettiKevin. The second prize had been previously announced as 'a book about poo' donated by @196photo; yesterday I picked up my prize parcel to find that it was indeed that, but much more besides, all beautifully wrapped, two thematically-appropriate books for the challenge, Michael Freeman's The Photographer's Pocket Book, a USB card reader, and, individually wrapped, and eminently useful, a surprise addition of four different rolls of 35mm film, Fomapan 400, Ilford Delta 3200, Fuji Superia 200, and a film I've not shot before, Adox Scala 160.